Sorry, But We Don't Work Late
After-hours aftermath: When the Maine Legislature ended its 2009 session shortly after 2 a.m. on June 13, most of the state’s media were nowhere to be seen. Even though legislators were still debating such important issues as highway funding and a bond package into the wee hours, reporters for a majority of the state’s dailies and broadcast outlets had already packed it in. Across most of Maine, that morning’s papers would carry nothing on the adjournment and – even more puzzling – they’d post nothing on their Web sites.
Here’s a rundown of how the print media handled this important story.
The Portland Press Herald did a credible job – at first. Staff writer Matt Wickenheiser hung on until the final gavel fell and posted a complete story on the Web.
I’m not sure if Wickenheiser’s piece made it into the Press Herald’s city edition (a reasonably comprehensive story showed up in earlier editions), but all the information was readily available online.
Trouble is, that’s the only place news the Legislature had finished its work showed up for readers outside greater Portland. There was no wrap-up or analysis in the June 14 Maine Sunday Telegram and nothing in the June 15 Press Herald. Considering the potential impacts of legislators’ last-minute decisions, it seems incredible that no editor assigned any additional stories. Maybe they were all too distracted by the impending sale of the paper (although they didn’t bother to publish anything on that, either, even though the closing seems to be common knowledge).
The Bangor Daily News would have scored highly in this competition – except the paper’s piece on adjournment didn’t run until two days after the event.
BDN reporter Kevin Miller kept his readers fully informed until about midnight on Friday. But as Saturday, June 13 rolled around, the paper stopped updating its Web site. What’s weird is, Miller was obviously still working. His June 15 print piece has all the details of the Legislature’s last gasp. But somebody apparently decided there was no need to share them with online readers for 48 hours. The public can wait a couple of days, the BDN apparently figured, or it can glean whatever it can from the sketchy story the Associated Press sent to radio and TV stations.
The Morning Sentinel in Waterville and Kennebec Journal in Augusta, both owned by the same company as the Press Herald, didn’t bother to post Wickenheiser’s article on their Web sites or use his earlier version in their print editions. They also had nothing from their own State House reporter, Susan Cover. The two papers seemed be pretending the whole thing didn’t happen, although the Sentinel did carry an AP story on the bond package on Sunday (which didn’t get posted online). The highway budget? The actual adjournment? An assessment of what it all means? Who cares?
The Sun Journal in Lewiston offered up its usual inept performance. Nothing on the Legislature’s final hours made it online or in print on Saturday. On Sunday, the paper ran an out-of-date AP brief from Friday night claiming the highway budget was “snarled in the House.”
By the time that gem made it into print, the budget had long since passed, and legislators had gone home. But nobody told the Sun Journal’s editors. They also offered up a piece from staff writer Rebekah Metzler detailing the session’s accomplishments. It had obviously been written before the highway and bond debates, since it contains no mention of either. It also carried the curious headline “Almost a wrap,” even though by the time it ran, the wrapping was complete. The piece wasn’t posted on the paper’s Web site. Probably just as well.
The Statehouse News Service, which supplies stories to the Times Record in Brunswick and the Journal Tribune in Biddeford as well as to a number of weeklies, seems to have been caught napping. By early afternoon Monday, neither of those afternoon dailies had posted a story on their Web sites. The Village Soup papers (where my weekly political column runs) had a staff-produced piece online on Monday morning. If any other weekly was carrying the news by then, I couldn’t find it.
Mal Leary of the Capitol News Service, hung in until the bitter end Saturday morning and filed stories and audio tape for radio stations. But Leary’s main outlet, Maine Public Radio, doesn’t do news on weekends, so there wasn’t much point in listening there.
Overall grade: feeble.
Elliott aftermath: Pseudonymous blogger Thomas Cushing Munjoy has what may be the final word on the firing in January of Morning Sentinel reporter Joel Elliott.
The Blethen Maine Newspapers, the owners of the Sentinel when Elliott was canned, have offered him seven and a half weeks’ pay (a little less than $5,300) and to remove all mention of his termination from his personnel file. In an e-mail to the Portland Newspaper Guild, the union that represents him, Elliott responded that he wants a year’s pay and a written retraction of the “false allegations” against him.
The guild, which has never been enthusiastic about pursuing the Elliott case, sent back an e-mail in which it said it has decided “on attorney advice” not take his case to arbitration. That leaves Elliott with few choices. He can fight the battle on his own in arbitration or through a complaint he’s filed with the National Labor Relations Board. Or he can take Blethen’s offer.
Expect the latter.
Al Diamon can be e-mailed at aldiamon@herniahill.net.
The views expressed on this Web site are those of the authors alone and do not necessarily represent the views of Down East Enterprise or its employees.










Spammed?
Spammed?
Staying late
Al -
You raise good points about timely publication of material, either online or in print, but there's one huge aspect to the practice of news coverage that your criticism never seems to touch upon:
How do you do it all with fewer people?
It's easy to sit back and say "they should have had this or that," but the hard part is figuring how to be multiple places at once without working yourself into an early grave. That's why you are going to see more press release re-writes (The BDN has one today, Wed. June 16, on the front of its State section about Jackson Laboratory) and fewer enterprise stories. Newspapers now have half as many people as they did 20,30 years ago but they still haven't accepted the fact that they cannot do as much as they used to. There's still a mentality at many papers that if a reader calls something in or sends in a press release about something that sounds remotely sane, the paper pretty much has to do something on it to keep the readership happy. That doesn't lend itself to giving reporters time to dig, to write, or even to walk the rounds of their beat. And I would suggest that, thanks to computers and the Internet, newspapers now get more information piled upon them (e-mails and press releases, mainly) than they used to. So with fewer people on staff, reporters and editors spend more time dealing with these things than they do on pursuing and developing good stories. Sometimes reporters are told they are expected to file more than one story a day. How are you going to win any investigative awards doing that?
I realize all this may not apply directly to the more senior reporters who are still given a lot of leeway in how they cover the State House. But to the extent that you and some people who read your column suggest that reporters today are lazy, you're living in the past. Reporters today are stretched so thin, it's stupid. If only they still had the luxuries of time that you and your former colleagues had the benefit of so many years ago.
So, Al, if you really want to do a service to the people who read your column, you should expend less energy on pointing out stories that newspapers miss or don't develop as you think they should (which is pretty easy to do) and spend more time helping newspapers and readers figure out how to work with the new realities that you and other retired reporters are lucky enough to have avoided. Then you really would be providing some valuable insight.
-Anon
Exactly
For as much time as Diamon spends detailing layoffs and the lack of press release re-writes, you'd think he'd put the two problems together. But apparently it's easier to repeatedly state the obvious than engage in the most rudimentary analysis.
Staying late
Here here. There might be reporters who write mediocre stories now and then, but I doubt there are many in Maine who anyone could say don't work hard.
Napping?
Al:
Your assumption that Chris Cousins of Statehouse News was "napping" is, as usual, inaccurate and unfair. Cousins was at the State House through adjournment Saturday morning. His story — including local implications and local reaction to the bond package — appeared in the Monday, June 15 edition, the first day The Times Record published after adjournment. The print edition was available at newsstands in Brunswick by 11 a.m. that day. Cousins' story was posted on our Web site at 2 p.m. Monday, the same time we posted other stories from that day's edition.
Robert Long
Managing editor
The Times Record
The KJ coverage
As far as I can tell, the KJ neglected to post this story online. The Sentinel, which presumably had access to the same information, didn't carry it in print or online. Sloppy.
And how come a newspaper that's only a mile or so from the State House is using AP copy, anyway? At least go with your own company's Matt Wick, who did a better job. And where was Cover?
As for TV, come on, do you expect me to criticize them every time they miss a big story? There'd be nothing else in this blog.
Al Diamon
OK, so you admit the KJ had the late Statehouse news
That's progress, Al. Thanks.
Next issue you raise: staffing. Don't wonder aloud why the KJ doesn't have the Statehouse covered 24/7 like it should (and we all know it should). These reporters have been given a nickel and asked to buy a gallon of gas for years now. Don't ask why: The money has gone to pay Blethen's financiers and management bonuses for Eric Conrad and his disgraced ilk.
Finally: posting online. The KJ usually does not post wire and other nonproprietary copy online. For whatever that's worth, it's been the policy.
It's a new day. We welcome new ownership.
The AP's State House
The AP's State House coverage frequently is weak, yet the KJ/Sentinel often choose to run poor AP copy instead of stronger PPH copy because of an age-old rivalry between the PPH and the KJ/Sentinel. Similarly, the PPH over the years often needlessly duplicated KJ/Sentinel stories, just so the PPH could slap its own byline on a story. We can only hope new ownership will finally put an end to that lunacy.
The other problem that came into play here is the stinginess of the Blethens when it came to paying overtime. No overtime pay, no late-night coverage. It's a pretty simple equation, really, and one for which management is to blame, not labor.
Lack of competence
is also to blame.
Central Me. vs. (South) Portland
Does anyone know whether the Sunday KJ/Sentinel edition (I know, theoretically they're two different papers) has better circulation in their service area (Kennebec, Somerset, maybe part of Waldo?) than the Sunday Telegram did before the Central papers started publishing on Sunday? Maybe the Augusta and Waterville papers could produce a Central Maine section for the Telegram, return that to general circulation north of Lewiston and drop the Central Sunday papers.
Of course, there's also the "two Maines" aspect to consider; customers up there may not take to the Portland paper.
Wrong again Al
"They also had nothing from their own State House reporter, Susan Cover. The two papers seemed be pretending the whole thing didn’t happen, although the Sentinel did carry an AP story on the bond package on Sunday (which didn’t get posted online). The highway budget? The actual adjournment? An assessment of what it all means? Who cares?"
On B3 of Saturday's KJ, an 8" wire piece with the headline "Late deals secure bonds, avoid new fuel tax increase", ran with jumps of Statehouse Notes and the Baldacci tax bill signing. I can post a PDF of the page if you'd like.
I know you make stuff up frequently in Internetworld, but actually, someone at the capital paper had the savvy to include the latest wire news available from the Statehouse, given print deadlines.
Oops!
Oops!
For the record
At 2 a.m. Saturday there were at least four print reporters still hanging around (including Mal, who also does radio). There were ZERO television crews, and you're criticizing newspapers?
unstellar statehouse coverage, disunity union
I'm often glad, reading Al's blog, that I'm not in the news business any more. When I was at the Press Herald, eons ago, we habitually went out and reported news. And we had a Guild that, though always weak, tried to protect members' interests. — John Lovell
The good 'ole days
That's right, John, pat yourself on the back. Because in the good old days you could write a 12" update on the sewer district with about five graphs of new information, take all 7.5 hours to do about an hour's worth of work, and still call yourself a reporter.
Dear Anonymous: I never
Dear Anonymous: I never covered a sewage session. You must be writing from your own experience. What we routinely did in what you call the good 'ole days was called enterprise reporting. That means digging out good stories from scratch instead of passively covering meetings. Before I got done calling myself a reporter, I had collected two dozen state and regional journalism awards and spent a decade moonlighting as a part-time journalism professor at USM. — John Lovell
Yeowza!
Snarky.
I'll keep the rest for myself.
Good ol' days
In the good ol' days, we used to yell "ole" at bullfights and "shut up" at bulls---...
Snap!
Snap!
Honestly....
I just checked in to read some of these posts. Honestly, the maturity level here seems to be about age seven.
Nanny-Nanny-boo-boo.
Nanny-Nanny-boo-boo.